Some of the messages were recovered from the emails accounts of people Clinton corresponded with, but the State Department has never offered a clear account of where all the messages originated. While the trove of messages Clinton returned was processed and released under FOIA during the 2016 campaign, messages have continued to emerge from the FBI. While Clinton turned over about 55,000 pages of emails to the State Department in response to its request to return the records, Trump and other Clinton critics have urged continued investigation to track down tens of thousands of other messages that Clinton ordered destroyed after her aides determined they were personal. “To argue that the Court now has enough information to determine whether State conducted an adequate search is preposterous,” Lamberth wrote. However, Lamberth said in his March ruling that the FBI probe and representations by the State Department had not adequately put to rest questions about the episode. The FBI investigated, interviewed Clinton and recommended against criminal charges, but it did find dozens of messages in her account that officials said contained highly classified information. In response to press questions during the campaign and in the sworn statement, Clinton said she kept the private account and server after taking over as secretary of State in 2009 as a matter of convenience and not to avoid the Freedom of Information Act or other disclosure requirements. The practice led to a storm of controversy that roiled her 2016 presidential bid and is widely viewed as contributing to her defeat by Donald Trump. “The Court’s opinion speaks for itself,” he said via email.ĭuring Clinton’s four years in Obama’s Cabinet, she relied on a private email account and server for both her work-related and personal messages. Longtime Clinton attorney David Kendall passed up a chance to publicly celebrate the court’s ruling. “We’re disappointed by the decision and considering our options,” Fitton said. Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the group is mulling its next steps. Bush appointee Thomas Griffith and Obama appointee Nina Pillard.
Wilkins’ 25-page opinion was joined by George W. Wilkins called the proposed topics for Clinton’s deposition “completely attenuated from any relevant issue in this case.” “These facts underscore both the impropriety of the District Court’s Order and the appropriateness of turning the page on the issue. “Secretary Clinton … provided eleven hours of public testimony before the House Select Committee, and has answered countless media inquiries on the matter,” wrote Wilkins, an appointee of President Barack Obama.
Circuit Judge Robert Wilkins suggested it was time to consign the Clinton email imbroglio to the history books.
Festify faq series#
Lamberth, an appointee of President Ronald Reagan who has tangled with Clinton administration aides in a series of cases for decades, called Hillary Clinton’s earlier answers “incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory, at best.”īut the appeals court ruled Friday that Lamberth’s order was a “clear abuse of discretion.”ĭ.C.
District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ordered the former first lady, Cabinet official and two-time Democratic presidential candidate to sit for a deposition.
0 kommentar(er)
